AgroTechnologyATLAS - End- and byproducts

End and by-products from processing of organic wastes

End and byproducts from processing of organic wastes are divided into 11 groups on basis of the processing technology used and their chemical composition.

SELECTION AND DEFINITION

Group of end and by-product (select):

Solids and fibres etc. are typically with a dry matter content of 25% and rich in organic bound phosphorus and nitrogen.

Solids and fibres etc. are typically with a dry matter content of 25% and rich in organic bound phosphorus and nitrogen.

DATASETS

You will after login have possibility to enter your own datasets, and to edit and delete them. Datasets shown on a purple background are not yet validated. Click the column header text for sorting ascending or descending.

Name	DM ≥	DM <	N ≥	N <	NH4-N ≥	NH4-N <	P ≥	P <	K ≥	K <	VS ≥	VS <	Mg ≥	Mg <	Ca ≥	Ca <	Na ≥	Cd ≥	Cu ≥	Cu <	Zn ≥	Zn <	Hg ≥	Pb ≥	Cr ≥	Ni ≥	Reference
Secondary waste water sludge, dehydrated	19,0																0,69										328
Secondary waste water sludge	5,0		10,00				15,00										0,69										327
Primary waste water sludge	4,0																0,69	1,51									326
Screw pressed organic household waste	25,0																0,69	1,51									319
Drum sieved organic household waste	28,0																0,69										318
Based on unspecified sewage sludge originating from urban	94,3								2,45									2,51	194,26				0,00		34,80		316
Based on raw sewage sludge originating from urban	5,2				0,97				0,66				0,20		3,46			0,06	19,55				0,04		1,61		315
Based on unspecified sewage sludge originating from urban	26,4		14,14		1,99		5,30		0,44		64,00																314
Based on unspecified sewage sludge originating from urban	7,6		27,78		17,17		3,57		10,54		71,00																313
Based on unspecified animal by-products originating from other/mixed	92,9		92,90		22,30		25,92		26,48		75,10																312
Based on unspecified sewage sludge originating from urban	15,5		6,45		0,82		2,02		1,14		49,33		3,90		13,80			0,22	26,78		154,11		0,06	8,74	8,37	5,51	311
Aerobic stabilized based on agroindustry sludge originating from industrial	3,1		2,04		0,35		1,29		0,64		48,76		0,29		2,23			0,03	3,31		9,82		0,00	0,33	0,66	1,01	310
Dehydrated based on unspecified sewage sludge originating from urban	16,5		9,00		3,28		3,71		0,71		60,61		0,54		7,15		0,23	0,18	62,04		104,45		0,13	6,85	5,12	3,53	251
Dehydrated based on unspecified vinasse originating from industrial	60,0		33,00				0,65		49,65				0,30		2,80												250
Solid fraction from a mechanical separator	28,3		11,80		5,40		6,90		3,90		212,30		4,80		8,10		0,80		93,90		282,60						114
Solid fraction	19,0		5,10				1,40				15,10																11
Fibre fraction	36,0		11,60		4,00		7,00		2,00																		10
Solid Fraction (20% inflow)	20,0		2,20				3,50		5,80		15,00																9
Fibre fraction	22,0	32,0	3,80	5,10	2,00	3,00	1,30	2,90	2,00																		8
Bioenergie-Region Südoldenburg pig slurry solid fraction	27,9	34,3	8,20	8,50	3,00	3,20	2,60	3,40	3,20	3,40	250,00	420,00	1,49	2,16	4,25	4,31			24,70	28,20	77,30	96,00					7
Fibre fraction	25,0		4,50		2,00		1,20		2,00																		6
Fibre fraction	20,0	30,0			2,80	6,90			1,50	3,72	178,00	276,00							10,00	42,00	20,00	231,00					5
Solid fraction pig manure	28,8																										4
Solid fraction	16,0		6,50				6,30				13,20																3
Fibre fraction	36,0		11,80		5,60		13,00		2,30																		2
Bioenergie-Region Südoldenburg pig slurry solid fraction	27,5	28,0	9,80	10,10	3,00	3,30	6,90		3,20		190,00		4,80		4,10				14,10		115,80						1
Average:	27,27	31,08	15,03	7,90	4,98	4,10	5,98	3,15	6,59	3,56	95,57	348,00	2,04	2,16	5,74	4,31	0,64	0,86	49,85	35,10	109,15	163,50	0,05	5,31	10,11	3,35	172,69

The signs '≥' means the parameter value is like ('=') or larger ('>') in case there is also indicated a less-than value ('<').

Used units are:

% for dry matter (DM), volatile solids (VS) and suspended matter
kg per ton for macro elements (N, NH4-N, P, K, organic C, Mg, Ca and Na)
gram per ton for trace elements (Cu, Zn, Hg, Pb, Cr and Ni)

Volatile solids (VS) is only a relevant parameter for solid fractions. Biologic oxygen demand (BOD), chemical oxygen demand (COD) and suspended matter only relevant for liquid fractions.

The shown values are to be considered as examples, alone, that illustrates the chemical composition for relevant parametres, and as well the variation in the composition. The references must be consulted in each case in order to clarify for instance the analysis method and the exact technologies that were used to produced the end or by-product.

REFERENCES AND COMMENTS

Where no other references are made, the source for the CO2 reduction coefficient (CO2e reduc. ton pr ton VS) is: Sven G. Sommer, Henrik B. Møller og Søren O. Pedersen. 2001. Reduktion af drivhusgasemission fra gylle og organisk affald ved biogasbehandling (In English: Reduction of green house gas emission from slurry and organic wastes by biogas treatment). Report No. 31 - Animal Production, from DJF (In English: Danish Institute of Agricultural Sciences). 53 pp., Appendix 3, Biogas scenario 2, without subsitation efftect.

Other references are incicated by: 'Reference number: Reference; Comment'

328: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).
327: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).
326: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).
319: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).
318: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).
316: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
315: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
314: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
313: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
312: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
311: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
310: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
251: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
250: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.
114: Gerard Velthof, Alterra Wageningen UR. (2009) Report: Kunstmestvervangers onderzocht . Tussentijds rapport van het onderzoek in het kader van de pilot Mineralenconcentraten / -
11: Rico. C.. García. H.. Rico. J.L. (2011). Physical–anaerobic–chemical process for treatment of dairy cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 102. 2143-2150. / These values of solids and nutrients concentration have been obtained at lab scale through a coagulation-flocculation separation process of dairy cattle manure.
10: Birkmose.T. (2010): Status over anvendelsen af gylleseparering i Danmark. maj 2010 . Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. Aarhus. Denmark. / The number of installations and treated amounts includes various types of mechanical separation (such as centrifuge. screw pressing. and band filer separation) following the flocculation. and we have not been able to divide these technologies.
9: Report authored by F. E. de Buisonjé and R.W. Melse Wageningen UR Livestock Research / Input type: Codigested cattle slurry. Pig slurry and Cattle slurry
8: - / Birkmose.T. (2010):
7: Brauckmann University of Osnabrueck / Data from test in July 2011. For details see www.bioenergie-suedoldenburg.de. Avarage and max. In practice of screw precces are mainly used with cattle slurre. There are no data aviable
6: Birkmose.T. (2010): Status over anvendelsen af gylleseparering i Danmark. maj 2010 . Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. Aarhus. Denmark. / -
5: E-mail/Oral Communication (Luis Ferreira) / (Oral comunication with L.Ferreira)
4: vcm inquiry (2010). VITO BBT study manure processing (2007) / Only the nitrification-denitrification facilities that separate pig or cattle manure as a first step are counted here; in addition: 6 anaerobic digestors use separation by centrifuge for post-treatment of their digestate. We can not distinguish between different separation technologies. therefore they are all counted as centrifuge (= most often used technique).
3: Unpublished data / There is only a decanter centrifuge for the separation of manure in Cantabria. It is a Pieralisi Baby2. installed in the pilot plant for I+D+i purposes. The centrifuge receives the liquid fraction of dairy manure separated by screw
2: - / Some of these centrifuge installations use coagulation/flocculation as pretreatment - however we do not know how many!
1: Brauckmann University of Osnabrueck / Data from test in July 2011 GEA and Spallek. Further informations on www.bioenergie-suedoldenburg.de In practice the Spallek centrifuge is used.

328: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).

327: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).

326: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).

319: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).

318: The data source is "Fact sheet for biogas" developed by NIRAS for Energinet.dk in 2012. Aarhus University has validated the data and also provided information about volatile solids and gas potential of the biomasses. The original data can be downloaded from http://implement.nu/wp-content/uploads/2013/06/Biogasdatagrundlaget_regneark.pdf. / The biogas potential is based on either a mesophilic process (38°C) with 25 days retention time, or thermophilic process (53°C) with 17 days retention time and 10 days in storage tank (10% biogas collected in covered after storage tank).

316: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

315: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

314: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

313: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

312: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

311: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

310: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

251: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

250: Michaud, A., et al. “EOM4SOIL - Physico-chemical Characteristics of External Organic Matters (EOMs) Database”. Version 1, Zenodo, 22 Oct. 2024, https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13969793. / Please check the reference; the figures may be averages of several analyses and there may be more details than presented here.

114: Gerard Velthof, Alterra Wageningen UR. (2009) Report: Kunstmestvervangers onderzocht . Tussentijds rapport van het onderzoek in het kader van de pilot Mineralenconcentraten / -

11: Rico. C.. García. H.. Rico. J.L. (2011). Physical–anaerobic–chemical process for treatment of dairy cattle manure. Bioresour. Technol. 102. 2143-2150. / These values of solids and nutrients concentration have been obtained at lab scale through a coagulation-flocculation separation process of dairy cattle manure.

10: Birkmose.T. (2010): Status over anvendelsen af gylleseparering i Danmark. maj 2010 . Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. Aarhus. Denmark. / The number of installations and treated amounts includes various types of mechanical separation (such as centrifuge. screw pressing. and band filer separation) following the flocculation. and we have not been able to divide these technologies.

9: Report authored by F. E. de Buisonjé and R.W. Melse Wageningen UR Livestock Research / Input type: Codigested cattle slurry. Pig slurry and Cattle slurry

8: - / Birkmose.T. (2010):

7: Brauckmann University of Osnabrueck / Data from test in July 2011. For details see www.bioenergie-suedoldenburg.de. Avarage and max. In practice of screw precces are mainly used with cattle slurre. There are no data aviable

6: Birkmose.T. (2010): Status over anvendelsen af gylleseparering i Danmark. maj 2010 . Danish Agricultural Advisory Service. Aarhus. Denmark. / -

5: E-mail/Oral Communication (Luis Ferreira) / (Oral comunication with L.Ferreira)

4: vcm inquiry (2010). VITO BBT study manure processing (2007) / Only the nitrification-denitrification facilities that separate pig or cattle manure as a first step are counted here; in addition: 6 anaerobic digestors use separation by centrifuge for post-treatment of their digestate. We can not distinguish between different separation technologies. therefore they are all counted as centrifuge (= most often used technique).

3: Unpublished data / There is only a decanter centrifuge for the separation of manure in Cantabria. It is a Pieralisi Baby2. installed in the pilot plant for I+D+i purposes. The centrifuge receives the liquid fraction of dairy manure separated by screw

2: - / Some of these centrifuge installations use coagulation/flocculation as pretreatment - however we do not know how many!

1: Brauckmann University of Osnabrueck / Data from test in July 2011 GEA and Spallek. Further informations on www.bioenergie-suedoldenburg.de In practice the Spallek centrifuge is used.